Who Saw Sovereign Debt Crises Coming?

Sebastián Nieto-Parra ()

Journal of LACEA Economia, 2009

Abstract: This paper studies sovereign debt crises during the period 1993–2006 through the prism of the primary sovereign bond market. It finds that one cannot reject the hypothesis that investment banks price sovereign default risk well before crises emerge and well before investors do. Investment banks charge a much higher underwriting fee between three years and one year before a crisis than they do during tranquil periods. This result is statistically significant after controlling for sovereign bond spreads and other variables. Moreover, investment banks’ behavior differs depending on the type of debt crisis. Before crises, investment banks charged on average a higher underwriting fee to countries presenting bad fundamentals than to other sovereign debt crisis countries. Finally, underwriting fees can be used as early warning indicators of debt crises. These results show that underwriting fees provide valuable information. It is puzzling that investors do not use this potentially useful public information in order to allocate efficiently their portfolios of emerging market fixed-income assets.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.brookings.edu/press/Journals/2010/economiafall2009.aspx

Related works:
Working Paper: Who Saw Sovereign Debt Crises Coming? (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:col:000425:008583

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of LACEA Economia from LACEA - LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION
Series data maintained by Carolina Prada Gutiérrez ().