The 2010 Merger Guidelines and the “Litigation Mulliganâ€Â: Better Economics but Not (Necessarily) More Clarity Before the Agencies and the Courts

Hill Wellford and Gregory Wells

Antitrust Chronicle, 2010, vol. 10

Abstract: The big development of the new Guidelines is that, read as a whole, they embrace three trends with the potential to make merger work significantly longer and less predictable. Hill Wellford & Gregory Wells (Bingham McCutchen)

JEL-codes: G34 G38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/the- ... ncies-and-the-courts (application/pdf)
Requires login and subscription

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpi:atchrn:10.2.2010:i=5720

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Antitrust Chronicle from Competition Policy International
Series data maintained by Lindsay McSweeney ().