Reasons to Reject a Ã¢â‚¬Å“No InjunctionsÃ¢â‚¬Â Rule for SEPs and FRAND-Obligated Patents
Antitrust Chronicle, 2012, vol. 4
This no-injunction idea appears to spring from a serious misunderstanding of the nature of FRAND obligations. Hill Wellford (Bingham McCutchen)
JEL-codes: L40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/reas ... nd-obligated-patents (application/pdf)
Requires login and subscription
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpi:atchrn:4.2.2012:i=6983
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Antitrust Chronicle from Competition Policy International
Series data maintained by Lindsay McSweeney ().