Reasons to Reject a “No Injunctions†Rule for SEPs and FRAND-Obligated Patents

Hill Wellford

Antitrust Chronicle, 2012, vol. 4

Abstract: This no-injunction idea appears to spring from a serious misunderstanding of the nature of FRAND obligations. Hill Wellford (Bingham McCutchen)

JEL-codes: L40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/reas ... nd-obligated-patents (application/pdf)
Requires login and subscription

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpi:atchrn:4.2.2012:i=6983

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Antitrust Chronicle from Competition Policy International
Series data maintained by Lindsay McSweeney ().