UNDERSTANDING HOW PEOPLE DECIDE: DECISION-MAKING THEORIES AS MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS
Journal of Community Positive Practices, 2015, issue 3, 3-13
This paper argues that instead of seeing the most influential theories in decisionmaking as competitive, one may contemplate the possibility that they are part of a wider theory of decision-making. This theory looks at how people decide based on how they structure a mental representation of a complex reality. Further, it gives a brief presentation of the mainstream theories in decision-making: expected utility theory, prospect theory, bounded rationality, parallel games, Rawls' theory of justice and multi-criteria decision-making. The conclusions suggest that research in the field should include the current theories of decision-making as possible mental representations, while also acknowledging some important epistemological problems in this field.
Keywords: mental representations; decision making; expected utility; prospect theory; bounded rationality; parallel games; justice; multi criteria decision making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://jppc.ro/index.php?page=download_articol&lan ... NTAL+REPRESENTATIONS First version, 2015 (application/pdf)
http://jppc.ro/index.php?page=descriere&lang=ro&nu ... RESENTATIONS#articol First version, 2015 (text/html)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cta:jcppxx:3151
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Community Positive Practices from Catalactica NGO
Series data maintained by Marian Matei ().