Abstract:
One of the most interesting and potentially useful outcomes of recent collaboration between natural and social scientists concerned with the sustainability of jointly determined ecological-economic systems is the application of the ecological concept of resilience. In its broadest sense, resilience is a measure of the ability of a system to withstand stresses and shocks its ability to persist in an uncertain world. For many policy-makers, however, the concern that desirable states or processes may not be sustainable is balanced by the concern that individuals and societies may get locked-in to undesirable states or processes. Many low-income countries, for example, are thought to have been caught in poverty traps, and poverty traps have since been seen as a major cause of environmental degradation (Dasgupta, 1993). Other examples of lock-in include our dependence on hydrocarbon-based technologies, or the institutional and cultural rigidities that stand in the way of change (Hanna, Folke, and M ler, 1996). Such states or processes are too persistent.
More articles in Environment and Development Economics from Cambridge University Press Address: The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 2RU UK Series data maintained by Mike Eden ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .