Abstract:
In our paper published in vol. 22, no. 1, of Econometric Theory (2006, pp. 69 97) the proof of (22) in Lemma 3.1 is incorrect as given. The problem in the proof occurs after the first display on p. 93 where we attempted to deduce (22) from the already established relation (21). The argument given there is incorrect, because an existence-quantor was mistaken for an all-quantor. We show how the problem can be repaired. In the course of this, we also note a useful variant of another result in Lemma 3.1.
More articles in Econometric Theory from Cambridge University Press Address: The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 2RU UK Series data maintained by Mike Eden ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .