Who Should Govern Congress? Access to Power and the Salary Grab of 1873

Lee J. Alston, Jeffery A. Jenkins and Tomas Nonnenmacher

The Journal of Economic History, 2006, vol. 66, issue 03, pages 674-706

Abstract: We examine the politics of the Salary Grab of 1873, legislation that increased congressional salaries retroactively by 50 percent. A group of New England and Midwestern elites opposed the Salary Grab, along with congressional franking and patronage-based civil service appointments, as part of a reform effort to reshape who should govern Congress. Our analyses of congressional voting confirm the existence of this nonparty elite coalition. Although these elites lost many legislative battles in the short run, their efforts kept reform on the legislative agenda throughout the late nineteenth century and ultimately set the stage for the Progressive movement in the early twentieth century.

Date: 2006

Downloads: (external link)
http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0022050706000295 link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Who Should Govern Congress? Access to Power and the Salary Grab of 1873 (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jechis:v:66:y:2006:i:03:p:674-706_00

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Economic History from Cambridge University Press
Address: The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 2RU UK
Series data maintained by Mike Eden ().