WHY ARE CAPITAL INCOME TAXES SO HIGH?

Martin Floden ()

Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2009, vol. 13, issue 03, pages 279-304

Abstract: The Ramsey optimal taxation theory implies that the tax rate on capital income should be zero in the long run. This result holds even if the social planner only cares about workers that do not hold assets, or if the planner only cares about any other group in the economy. This paper demonstrates that although all households agree that capital income taxation should be eliminated in the long run, they do not agree on how to eliminate these taxes. Wealthy households would prefer a reform that is funded by higher taxes on labor income, whereas households with little wealth would prefer a reform that is funded mostly by high taxes on initial wealth. Pareto-improving reforms typically exist, but the welfare gains of such reforms are modest.

Date: 2009
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S136510050808005X link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Why Are Capital Income Taxes So High? (2006)
Working Paper: Why Are Capital Income Taxes So High? (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:macdyn:v:13:y:2009:i:03:p:279-304_08

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Macroeconomic Dynamics from Cambridge University Press
Address: The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 2RU UK
Series data maintained by Mike Eden ().