A COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR TESTING THE UTILITY MAXIMIZATION HYPOTHESIS WHEN QUANTITY DATA ARE MEASURED WITH ERROR

Barry Edward Jones () and Philippe de Peretti

Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2005, vol. 9, issue 05, pages 612-629

Abstract: The Generalized Axiom of Revealed Preference (GARP) can be violated because of random measurement errors in the observed quantity data. We study two tests proposed by Varian (1985) and de Peretti (2004), which test GARP within an explicit stochastic framework. Both tests compute adjusted quantity data that are compliant with GARP. We compare and contrast the two tests in theoretical terms and in an empirical application. The empirical application is based on testing a large group of monetary assets for the United States over multiple sample periods spanning 1960 1992. We found that both tests provided reasonable results and were largely consistent with each other.

Date: 2005
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1365100505040381 link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:macdyn:v:9:y:2005:i:05:p:612-629_04

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Macroeconomic Dynamics from Cambridge University Press
Address: The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 2RU UK
Series data maintained by Mike Eden ().