Abstract:
Tied aid invites a Pareto-improving situation in the presence of environmental externalities. Under certain conditions, although the aid recipient government's marginal propensity to consume the purchased good is lower or higher than the corresponding marginal propensity of the aid recipient individuals, the welfare of both the donor and the recipient improves in the presence of production- or consumption-based pollution. This result counters the conventional wisdom of tied aid presented by Kemp and Kojima (1985).