Abstract:
I show that the relationship between the toughness of price competition and market size in oligopoly models depends on assumptions about the shape of preferences. In a Perloff and Salop model of nonlocalized taste for variety, price-cost margins remain bounded above zero as market size grows infinitely large, even as the number of firms grows without bound. By contrast, a Salop circle model of localized preferences generates price-cost margins that fall to zero as market size grows large. The toughness of price competition never reaches competitive levels if nonlocalized preferences generate entry opportunities that expand the set of product variants. The toughness of price competition rises to competitive levels if localized preferences generate entry opportunities to "fill in" product space. I also outline an empirical test for boundedness of price-cost margins by examining boundedness of firm revenues in chain and non-chain restaurants in Census of Retail Trade data.
More articles in Economics Bulletin from Economics Bulletin Address: Economics Bulletin, Department of Economics, 414 Calhoun Hall, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37235, USA Series data maintained by John Conley ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .