Are Welfare Eligible Households Forward Looking?

Hal Snarr () and Dan Axelsen ()
Additional contact information
Hal Snarr: North Carolina A & T State University
Dan Axelsen: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Economics Bulletin, 2008, vol. 9, issue 8, pages 1-9

Abstract: A consensus has formed in the welfare reform literature suggesting that welfare eligible households (WEH) “bank” benefits in the presence of time limits, either by delaying enrollment in welfare or exiting well before the time limit is reached. In this study, we use the standard labor-leisure lifetime utility to analyze the behavioral effects of imposing time limits on welfare use. Our approach is different from our predecessors (which model welfare participation) in that we model delayed enrollment in and early exit from welfare. Our results suggest that prior to time limits, WEH enroll in welfare as soon as eligibility is established and remain on assistance programs until their youngest children reach adulthood. Moreover, time limits do not alter this behavior in WEH with older children. As such, being “forward looking” in an era of time limits is not a sufficient condition for banking welfare benefits.

Keywords: Time Limits; Welfare reform; Single Mother; TANF; AFDC; Welfare dynamics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I3 J2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008-04-11
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://economicsbull ... me9/EB-08I30020A.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economics Bulletin from Economics Bulletin
Address: Economics Bulletin, Department of Economics, 414 Calhoun Hall, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37235, USA
Series data maintained by John Conley ().