Evaluating coasean bargaining experiments with meta-analysis
Tyler Prante (),
Jennifer A. Thacher () and
Robert P. Berrens Additional contact information Tyler Prante: PhD. Candidate, Dept. of Economics, University of New Mexico
Jennifer A. Thacher: Assistant Professor, Dept. of Economics, University of New Mexico
Abstract:
While the Coase Theorem has been a touchstone for understanding bargaining behavior, it has also been criticized for relying on unrealistic assumptions. In response, a line of experimental research analyzes bargaining behavior in laboratory settings. This paper uses meta-analysis to evaluate the Coasean bargaining literature by modeling the probability of an efficient bargain as a function of: (1) measures of transaction costs and related variables, and (2) measures of the social dimensions of a bargain. Results suggest that efficient solutions are more likely when explicit transaction costs do not exist, in the absence of a binding time limit, and when participants have perfect information on payoff schedules. Social dimension variables are found to have the potential to affect bargaining outcomes and are an important avenue for further research.
More articles in Economics Bulletin from Economics Bulletin Address: Economics Bulletin, Department of Economics, 414 Calhoun Hall, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37235, USA Series data maintained by John Conley ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .