Naturally Occurring Markets and Exogenous Laboratory Experiments: A Case Study of the Winner's Curse

Glenn W. Harrison () and John List ()

Economic Journal, 2008, vol. 118, issue 528, pages 822-843

Abstract: We examine the relevance of experimental findings from laboratory settings that abstract from the field context of the task that theory purports to explain. Using common value auction theory as our guide, we identify naturally occurring settings in which one can test the theory. Experienced agents bidding in familiar roles do not fall prey to the winner's curse. Yet, experienced agents fall prey to the winner's curse when bidding in an unfamiliar role. We conclude that the theory predicts field behaviour well when one is able to identify naturally occurring field counterparts to the key theoretical conditions. Copyright © 2008 The Author(s).

Date: 2008

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02144.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Naturally Occurring Markets and Exogenous Laboratory Experiments: A Case Study of the Winner's Curse (2007)
Working Paper: Naturally Occurring Markets and Exogenous Laboratory Experiments: A Case Study of the Winner’s Curse (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is edited by Antonio Ciccone, Leonardo Felli, Steve Machin, Andrew Scott, Steve Pischke and David Myatt

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().