Is Bayesian Rationality Compatible with Strategic Rationality?

Marco Mariotti

Economic Journal, 1995, vol. 105, issue 432, pages 1099-1109

Abstract: In Bayesian game theory, each player obeys the Savage axioms and there is common knowledge of this. The author shows that two of the less controversial axioms (ordering and dominance) are incompatible with some elementary game theoretic principles. He furthermore argues that his impossibility result is the consequence of a more fundamental conflict between the states of nature/acts framework of decision theory and the principles of strategic rationality. Copyright 1995 by Royal Economic Society.

Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%2819950 ... 0.CO%3B2-M&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:105:y:1995:i:432:p:1099-1109

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing ().