Institutions and the Resource Curse

Halvor Mehlum (), Karl Ove Moene () and Ragnar Torvik ()

Economic Journal, 2006, vol. 116, issue 508, pages 1-20

Abstract: Countries rich in natural resources constitute both growth losers and growth winners. We claim that the main reason for these diverging experiences is differences in the quality of institutions. More natural resources push aggregate income down, when institutions are grabber friendly, while more resources raise income, when institutions are producer friendly. We test this theory building on Sachs and Warner's influential works on the resource curse. Our main hypothesis - that institutions are decisive for the resource curse - is confirmed. Our results contrast the claims of Sachs and Warner that institutions do not play a role. Copyright 2006 Royal Economic Society.

Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (90) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01045.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Institutions and the Resource Curse (2004)
Working Paper: Institutions and the resource curse (2003)
Working Paper: Institutions and the resource curse (2002)
Working Paper: Institutions and the resource curse (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:116:y:2006:i:508:p:1-20

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is edited by Antonio Ciccone, Steve Machin, Andrew Scott, Steve Pischke and David Myatt

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing ().