Decision Makers as Statisticians: Diversity, Ambiguity, and Learning

Nabil I. Al-Najjar

Econometrica, 2009, vol. 77, issue 5, pages 1371-1401

Abstract: I study individuals who use frequentist models to draw uniform inferences from independent and identically distributed data. The main contribution of this paper is to show that distinct models may be consistent with empirical evidence, even in the limit when data increases without bound. Decision makers may then hold different beliefs and interpret their environment differently even though they know each other's model and base their inferences on the same evidence. The behavior modeled here is that of rational individuals confronting an environment in which learning is hard, rather than individuals beset by cognitive limitations or behavioral biases. Copyright 2009 The Econometric Society.

Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.3982/ECTA7501 link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:77:y:2009:i:5:p:1371-1401

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... mb.asp?ref=0012-9682

Access Statistics for this article

Econometrica is edited by Stephen Morris

More articles in Econometrica from Econometric Society
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().