More on monotone instrumental variables
Charles Manski () and
John Pepper ()
Econometrics Journal, 2009, vol. 12, issue s1, pages S200-S216
Econometric analyses of treatment response often use instrumental variable (IV) assumptions to identify treatment effects. The traditional IV assumption holds that mean response is constant across the sub-populations of persons with different values of an observed covariate. Manski and Pepper (2000) introduced monotone instrumental variable assumptions, which replace equalities with weak inequalities. This paper presents further analysis of the monotone instrumental variable (MIV) idea. We use an explicit response model to enhance the understanding of the content of MIV and traditional IV assumptions. We study the identifying power of MIV assumptions when combined with the homogeneous linear response assumption maintained in many studies of treatment response. We also consider estimation of MIV bounds, with particular attention to finite-sample bias. Copyright (C) The Author(s). Journal compilation (C) Royal Economic Society 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (27) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2008.00262.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ect:emjrnl:v:12:y:2009:i:s1:p:s200-s216
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Econometrics Journal is currently edited by Richard J. Smith, Oliver Linton, Pierre Perron, Jaap Abbring and Marius Ooms
More articles in Econometrics Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing ().