The crisis of fair-value accounting: Making sense of the recent debate

Christian Laux and Christian Leuz

Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2009, vol. 34, issue 6-7, pages 826-834

Abstract: The recent financial crisis has led to a vigorous debate about the pros and cons of fair-value accounting (FVA). This debate presents a major challenge for FVA going forward and standard setters' push to extend FVA into other areas. In this article, we highlight four important issues as an attempt to make sense of the debate. First, much of the controversy results from confusion about what is new and different about FVA. Second, while there are legitimate concerns about marking to market (or pure FVA) in times of financial crisis, it is less clear that these problems apply to FVA as stipulated by the accounting standards, be it IFRS or US GAAP. Third, historical cost accounting (HCA) is unlikely to be the remedy. There are a number of concerns about HCA as well and these problems could be larger than those with FVA. Fourth, although it is difficult to fault the FVA standards per se, implementation issues are a potential concern, especially with respect to litigation. Finally, we identify several avenues for future research.

Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VCK ... 178f7f3c504bb77c54fd
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:34:y:2009:i:6-7:p:826-834

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting, Organizations and Society is edited by A. G. Hopwood

More articles in Accounting, Organizations and Society from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().