No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for [`]intelligent' accountability

John Roberts

Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2009, vol. 34, issue 8, pages 957-970

Abstract: This paper draws on the work of Butler [Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press] to develop a critique of the operation and adequacy of transparency as a form of accountability. The paper begins with an exploration of accountability as subjection explored through Lacan's account of the social dynamics of recognition, and Freud's account of guilt. This analysis then informs an exploration of what is argued to be our typically ambivalent embrace of transparency as a form of accountability. The final section of the paper investigates the potential for a more [`]intelligent' form of accountability, grounded in an ethic of humility and generosity, made possible by a conscious acknowledgement of the ways in which I can never quite know what it is that I am doing.

Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VCK ... a75cfee5f6550f0bfc9e
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:34:y:2009:i:8:p:957-970

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting, Organizations and Society is edited by A. G. Hopwood

More articles in Accounting, Organizations and Society from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().