Management by results: Student evaluation of faculty teaching and the mis-measurement of performance

Laura Langbein

Economics of Education Review, 2008, vol. 27, issue 4, pages 417-428

Abstract: Using data on 4 years of courses at American University, regression results show that actual grades have a significant, positive effect on student evaluations of teaching (SETs), controlling for expected grade and fixed effects for both faculty and courses, and for possible endogeneity. Implications are that the SET is a faulty measure of teaching quality and grades a faulty signal of future job performance. Students, faculty, and provost appear to be engaged in an individually rational but socially destructive game of grade inflation centered on the link between SETs and grades. When performance is hard to measure, pay-for-performance, embodied by the link between SETs and faculty pay, may have unintended adverse consequences.

Date: 2008

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VB9 ... 071a01cb56143ef83a5e
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:27:y:2008:i:4:p:417-428

Access Statistics for this article

Economics of Education Review is edited by E. Cohn

More articles in Economics of Education Review from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().