Effects of school choice on the margin: The cream is already skimmed

Patrick Walsh

Economics of Education Review, 2009, vol. 28, issue 2, pages 227-236

Abstract: Critics of school choice argue that cream-skimming will worsen outcomes for those left behind in public schools. Since "high ability" families may have already sorted themselves out of the schools in question, this paper will examine whether existing within-school heterogeneity leaves any scope for cream-skimming to operate. It asks, "given the current level of within-school heterogeneity, how strong would peer effects have to be to significantly worsen outcomes for those left behind?" In order for cream-skimming to lower math test scores by one half-year's progress, the peer effect would have to be as strong as increasing class sizes by 8-20 students, or cutting per-student funding by $400-2000. These results indicate that current levels of within-school heterogeneity are so low that peer effects would have to be unrealistically strong to give cream-skimming any bite.

Keywords: School; choice; Privatization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VB9 ... 23b4fc5a5e2d3aea8cb6
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:28:y:2009:i:2:p:227-236

Access Statistics for this article

Economics of Education Review is edited by E. Cohn

More articles in Economics of Education Review from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().