Economists, value judgments, and climate change: A view from feminist economics

Julie Nelson ()

Ecological Economics, 2008, vol. 65, issue 3, pages 441-447

Abstract: A number of recent discussions about ethical issues in climate change, as engaged in by economists, have focused on the value of the parameter representing the rate of time preference within models of optimal growth. This essay examines many economists' antipathy to serious discussion of ethical matters, and suggests that the avoidance of questions of intergenerational equity is related to another set of value judgments concerning the quality and objectivity of economic practice. Using insights from feminist philosophy of science and research on high reliability organizations, this essay argues that a more ethically transparent, real-world-oriented, and flexible economic practice would lead to more reliable and useful knowledge.

Date: 2008

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VDY ... 909a99c135a964cadc1d
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:65:y:2008:i:3:p:441-447

Access Statistics for this article

Ecological Economics is edited by C. J. Cleveland

More articles in Ecological Economics from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().