Can rejections of weak separability be attributed to random measurement errors in the data?

Thomas Elger () and Barry Edward Jones ()

Economics Letters, 2008, vol. 99, issue 1, pages 44-47

Abstract: Standard non-parametric weak separability tests do not account for measurement errors in the data. We propose a method to determine if rejections of weak separability obtained using such tests can be attributed to random measurement errors in the quantity data.

Date: 2008
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V84 ... a9041a0c039d9f145e0b
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:99:y:2008:i:1:p:44-47

Access Statistics for this article

Economics Letters is edited by E. Maskin

More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().