Choosing instrumental variables in conditional moment restriction models

Stephen G. Donald, Guido W. Imbens and Whitney K. Newey

Journal of Econometrics, 2009, vol. 152, issue 1, pages 28-36

Abstract: Properties of GMM estimators are sensitive to the choice of instrument. Using many instruments leads to high asymptotic asymptotic efficiency but can cause high bias and/or variance in small samples. In this paper we develop and implement asymptotic mean square error (MSE) based criteria for instrument selection in estimation of conditional moment restriction models. The models we consider include various nonlinear simultaneous equations models with unknown heteroskedasticity. We develop moment selection criteria for the familiar two-step optimal GMM estimator (GMM), a bias corrected version, and generalized empirical likelihood estimators (GEL), that include the continuous updating estimator (CUE) as a special case. We also find that the CUE has lower higher-order variance than the bias-corrected GMM estimator, and that the higher-order efficiency of other GEL estimators depends on conditional kurtosis of the moments.

Keywords: Conditional; moment; restrictions; Generalized; method; of; moments; Generalized; empirical; likelihood; Mean; squared; error (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VC0 ... ac7e7597e24a9a6c4071
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:econom:v:152:y:2009:i:1:p:28-36

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Econometrics is edited by T. Amemiya, A. R. Gallant, J. F. Geweke, C. Hsiao, P. M. Robinson and A. Zellner

More articles in Journal of Econometrics from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().