Patent law and complementary innovations

Yann Ménière ()

European Economic Review, 2008, vol. 52, issue 7, pages 1125-1139

Abstract: This paper explores which patent policy should be applied to complementary innovations that are aggregated into broader technologies. I compare a setting in which complementary innovations must be bundled prior to patenting, with a second setting in which they can be patented separately. The first setting can improve static efficiency by avoiding the costs resulting from the scattering of complementary patents. But it also limits the disclosure of small innovations, which may lead to inefficient R&D cost duplications. A model capturing these effects shows that patenting complementary innovations separately is not efficient when innovations can be developed rapidly. This result justifies the enforcement of a severe "inventive step" or "non-obviousness" requirement in sectors where complementary innovations are frequent.

Keywords: Innovation; Patent; R&; D; Complementarity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V64 ... 7dbc676d1f82b3135d4c
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Patent Law and complementary innovations (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:52:y:2008:i:7:p:1125-1139

Access Statistics for this article

European Economic Review is edited by G. A. Pfann, Z. Eckstein, E. Gal-Or, T. Gylfason and J. Von Hagen

More articles in European Economic Review from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().