Assessing the role of option grants to CEOs: How important is heterogeneity?

Nina Baranchuk and Siddhartha Chib

Journal of Empirical Finance, 2008, vol. 15, issue 2, pages 145-166

Abstract: This paper revisits the question of whether CEO compensation practices are in keeping with those justified by agency theory. We develop and analyze a new panel Tobit model, estimated by modern Bayesian methods, in which the heterogeneity of covariate effects across firms is modeled in a hierarchical way. We find that our specification of heterogeneity provides a significantly improved fit to the data. Our results show support for the hypothesis that companies increase option awards to their CEOs when agency problems become more pronounced. We also find that liquidity constraints matter in defining the cash-option mix of CEO compensation.

Date: 2008

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VFG ... 5be771783c9067b87d34
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:empfin:v:15:y:2008:i:2:p:145-166

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Empirical Finance is edited by R. T. Baillie, G. Bekaert, W. Ferson, F. C. Palm, Th. J. Vermaelen and C. C. P. Wolff

More articles in Journal of Empirical Finance from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().