A lesson from Argentina: Setting transmission tolls in a competitive auction is much better than regulating them

Alexander Galetovic and Juan Ricardo Inostroza

Energy Economics, 2008, vol. 30, issue 4, pages 1334-1366

Abstract: There are at least two procedures for setting the tolls paid by power line users. One consists of regulating them in a standard process. The other, which is used in Argentina, involves auctioning the lines to the lowest toll. In this paper we show that an auction yields higher expected social welfare if n >= 2 bid. Expected social welfare is even higher if, as in Argentina, those who benefit from the line can also bid and build. Moreover, when the social welfare is utilitarian, an auction beats regulation even when the regulator can perfectly audit costs ex post. We describe and examine the auction of the fourth Comahue transmission line in Argentina. Assuming that the regulator's information about costs is similar to the information held by the industry, the model suggests that had tolls been regulated, they would have been at least 61% higher.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedi ... 6ac2898bc295c0171658
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this article

Energy Economics is edited by R. S. J. Tol and J. P. Weyant

More articles in Energy Economics from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().