The postbellum demand for cotton revisited

Erik D. Craft and James Monks

Explorations in Economic History, 2008, vol. 45, issue 2, pages 199-206

Abstract: The literature offers both supply-side and cotton demand-side explanations for the reduced level and growth of income in the postbellum South. Demand-side evidence begins with a single-equation relationship regressing the price of cotton on quantity and a trend term, although subsequent researchers have critiqued the economic significance of the supposed slowed growth in demand. Using a system of simultaneous equations, which allows for correction both for autocorrelation in the error terms and correlation of the error terms across equations, we find cotton demand to be unit elastic from 1865--1866 to 1894--1895 and that it grew between 1.1% and 2.8% a year.

Date: 2008

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WFJ ... bb20b0d27c8946685973
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:exehis:v:45:y:2008:i:2:p:199-206

Access Statistics for this article

Explorations in Economic History is edited by R. A. Margo

More articles in Explorations in Economic History from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().