Criminal sentencing in 19th-century Pennsylvania

Howard Bodenhorn

Explorations in Economic History, 2009, vol. 46, issue 3, pages 287-298

Abstract: How law is interpreted and enforced at a particular historical moment reflects contemporary social concerns, attitudes and prejudices. This paper investigates the nature of criminal sentencing in 19th-century Pennsylvania. It finds that juries systematically departed from presumptive sentences based on extralegal factors, such age, sex, nativity and occupation. Older criminals and convicts with higher status preconviction occupations received longer sentences; women and ethnic minorities received shorter sentences. Unlike 20th-century courts, 19th-century courts did not impose longer sentences on black criminals.

Keywords: Economics; of; crime; Criminal; sentencing; Racial; disparities; Ethnic; disparities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WFJ ... 55b35730f6b9dd07d512
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:exehis:v:46:y:2009:i:3:p:287-298

Access Statistics for this article

Explorations in Economic History is edited by R. A. Margo

More articles in Explorations in Economic History from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().