Lexicographic composition of simple games

O'Neill, Barry and Bezalel Peleg

Games and Economic Behavior, 2008, vol. 62, issue 2, pages 628-642

Abstract: Certain voting bodies can be modeled as a simple game where a coalition's winning depends on whether it wins, blocks or loses in two smaller simple games. There are essentially five such ways to combine two proper games into a proper game. The most decisive is the lexicographic rule, where a coalition must either win in G1, or block in G1 and win in G2. When two isomorphic games are combined lexicographically, a given role for a player confers equal or more power when held in the first game than the second, if power is assessed by any semi-value. A game is lexicographically separable when the players of the two components partition the whole set. Games with veto players are not separable, and games of two or more players with identical roles are separable only if decisive. Some separable games are egalitarian in that they give players identical roles.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedi ... 26598284daa008c765cd
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this article

Games and Economic Behavior is edited by E. Kalai

More articles in Games and Economic Behavior from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().