Stuck on gold: Real exchange rate volatility and the rise and fall of the gold standard, 1875-1939

Natalia Chernyshoff, David S. Jacks () and Alan M. Taylor ()

Journal of International Economics, 2009, vol. 77, issue 2, pages 195-205

Abstract: Did the gold standard diminish macroeconomic volatility? Supporters thought so, critics thought not, and theory offers ambiguous messages. Hard regimes like the gold standard limit monetary shocks by tying policymakers' hands; but exchange-rate inflexibility compromises shock absorption in a world of real disturbances and nominal stickiness. A model shows how lack of flexibility affects the transmission of terms-of-trade shocks. Evidence from the late nineteenth and early twentieth century exposes a dramatic change. The classical gold standard did absorb shocks, but the interwar gold standard did not, supporting the view that the interwar gold standard was a poor regime choice.

Keywords: Nominal; rigidity; Exchange-rate; regime; Terms-of-trade; shocks; Optimal; monetary; policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V6D ... 177ac71c5357e67e659d
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Stuck on Gold: Real Exchange Rate Volatility and the Rise and Fall of the Gold Standard, 1870-1939 (2005)
Working Paper: Stuck on Gold: Real Exchange Rate Volatility and the Rise and Fall of the Gold Standard, 1870-1939 (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:inecon:v:77:y:2009:i:2:p:195-205

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of International Economics is edited by J. Eaton and C. M. Engel

More articles in Journal of International Economics from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().