Was audit quality of Laventhol and Horwath poor?

Lai, Kam-Wah and Ferdinand A. Gul

Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2008, vol. 27, issue 3, pages 217-237

Abstract: Laventhol and Horwath (L&H), the then seventh largest accounting firm in the US, declared bankruptcy in November 1990. The firm claimed that its bankruptcy was due to the perception of it being a deep pocket rather than inherent deficiencies in its performance. In this study, we examine whether the audit quality of L&H was lower than other auditors. Results do not show that L&H is associated with lower quality audits either in terms of lower likelihood of issuing modified audit opinion, higher levels of discretionary accruals for its clients, or lower predictability of discretionary accruals for future non-discretionary net income for its clients than for clients of other auditors. Results of additional tests also do not suggest that auditors that take up clients of L&H report differently from L&H. This evidence does not support the proposition that L&H's audit quality was less than audit quality of other audit firms during the period leading up to the bankruptcy.

Date: 2008

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VBG ... d7f5aedc826688dd9fe6
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jappol:v:27:y:2008:i:3:p:217-237

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Accounting and Public Policy is edited by L. A. Gordon

More articles in Journal of Accounting and Public Policy from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().