EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Pre-commitment and personality: Behavioral explanations in ultimatum games

Pamela Schmitt (), Robert Shupp, Kurtis Swope and Justin Mayer

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2008, vol. 66, issue 3-4, pages 597-605

Abstract: In a laboratory ultimatum bargaining experiment, responder behavior is more consistent with game-theoretic predictions when responders indicate a binding minimum acceptable offer (MAO) or when rejection penalizes a "hostage" third player. In general, female subjects indicated higher MAOs but had a much greater reaction than males to the presence of a third player. Offers increase in the presence of a binding MAO but are not affected by a third player. Behavior in our experiment is also generally consistent with hypotheses based on a popular personality test instrument.

Date: 2008

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8F ... d3f1109c453c260d09c6
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization is edited by J. B. Rosser

More articles in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().

 
Page updated 2008-11-08
Handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:66:y:2008:i:3-4:p:597-605