Testing theories of reciprocity: Do motivations matter?

Luca Stanca (), Luigino Bruni and Luca Corazzini ()

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2009, vol. 71, issue 2, pages 233-245

Abstract: One of the key issues for understanding reciprocity is how agents evaluate the kindness of an action. In this paper we investigate experimentally the hypothesis that the motivation driving an action is relevant for its perceived kindness and, as a consequence, for reciprocal behavior. In particular, we examine the hypothesis that, for a given distributional outcome, positive reciprocity is less strong in response to strategically motivated actions than to non-strategically motivated actions. Our results indicate that, both at the aggregate and the individual level, reciprocity is significantly stronger when strategic motivations can be ruled out. These findings suggest that intentions matter and, in particular, that models of intention-based reciprocity should take into account the nature of the motivations behind choices.

Keywords: Reciprocity; Motivations; Laboratory; experiments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8F ... 43c4a98af2bb83d2c554
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Testing Theories of Reciprocity: Do Motivations Matter? (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:71:y:2009:i:2:p:233-245

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization is edited by J. B. Rosser

More articles in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().