Direct evidence on income comparisons and their welfare effects
Claudia Senik ()
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2009, vol. 72, issue 1, 408-424
This paper provides direct evidence that income comparisons exert a significant impact on subjective well-being. It also evaluates the relative importance of different types of benchmarks. Internal comparisons to one's own past living standard outweigh any other comparison benchmarks. Local comparisons (to one's parents, former colleagues or high school mates) are more powerful than self-ranking in the social ladder. The impact of comparisons is asymmetric: under-performing one's benchmark always has a greater welfare effect than out-performing it (in absolute value). Comparisons, which reduce satisfaction also increase the demand for income redistribution, but there, the relative impact of subjective ranking is preponderant.
Keywords: Subjective; well-being; Income; comparisons; Demand; for; income; redistribution; Internal; and; external; benchmarks; Transition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (122) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Direct evidence on income comparisons and their welfare effects (2008)
Working Paper: Direct Evidence on Income Comparisons and their Welfare Effects (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:72:y:2009:i:1:p:408-424
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization is currently edited by Neilson, William Stuart
More articles in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu ().