A multiperiod evaluation of returns following seasoned equity offerings

M. Bayless and N. Jay

Journal of Economics and Business, 2008, vol. 60, issue 4, pages 291-311

Abstract: In this paper, we argue that the evaluation of returns following an equity issue has been hampered by a narrow focus on the period immediately following the issue. We relax this constraint and compare the risk-adjusted performance of firms following an equity issue with their performance during periods when there was no issue activity. We employ this methodology in a calendar-time framework along with a six-factor-generating model of expected returns and a matched sample of non-issuing firms. Our results indicate that the six-factor model of expected returns cannot explain firm's underperformance following an issue as suggested by Eckbo, E., Masulis, R., and Norli, O. [(2000). Seasoned public offerings: Resolution of the [`]New issues puzzle. Journal of Financial Economics, 56, 251-291]. Our approach also produces new empirical evidence that weak returns following an equity issue are consistent with pseudo market timing by issuing firms as argued by Schultz [Schultz, P. (2003). Pseudo market timing and the long-run underperformance of IPO's. Journal of Finance, 58, 483-517; Schultz, P. (2004). Pseudo market timing and the stationarity of the event-generating process (Working Paper). University of Norte Dame].

Date: 2008

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V7T ... 3ff0401b7eb64076e99a
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jebusi:v:60:y:2008:i:4:p:291-311

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economics and Business is edited by G. P. Szegö

More articles in Journal of Economics and Business from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().