On the genericity of full surplus extraction in mechanism design

Paulo Barelli

Journal of Economic Theory, 2009, vol. 144, issue 3, pages 1320-1332

Abstract: Heifetz and Neeman [A. Heifetz, Z. Neeman, On the generic (im)possibility of full surplus extraction, Econometrica 74 (2006) 213-233], using convex combinations of models, showed that full surplus extraction (FSE) in mechanism design is generically impossible, contrary to the seminal work of Cremer and McLean [J. Cremer, R. McLean, Full extraction of the surplus in Bayesian and dominant strategy auctions, Econometrica 53 (1988) 345-361]. Since Cremer and McLean did not allow convex combinations of models, the two results are not comparable. We show that FSE is generically impossible when convex combinations of models are not allowed, provided that we do not hold fixed the cardinality of models.

Keywords: Full; surplus; extraction; Mechanism; design; Universal; beliefs; space; Common; knowledge (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WJ3 ... 3813af9ba212812bbb08
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:144:y:2009:i:3:p:1320-1332

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Theory is edited by A. Lizzeri and K. Shell

More articles in Journal of Economic Theory from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().