EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Apportioning of risks via stochastic dominance

Louis Eeckhoudt, Harris Schlesinger and Ilia Tsetlin

Journal of Economic Theory, 2009, vol. 144, issue 3, pages 994-1003

Abstract: Consider a simple two-state risk with equal probabilities for the two states. In particular, assume that the random wealth variable dominates via ith-order stochastic dominance for i=M,N. We show that the 50-50 lottery dominates the lottery via (N+M)th-order stochastic dominance. The basic idea is that a decision maker exhibiting (N+M)th-order stochastic dominance preference will allocate the state-contingent lotteries in such a way as not to group the two "bad" lotteries in the same state, where "bad" is defined via ith-order stochastic dominance. In this way, we can extend and generalize existing results about risk attitudes. This lottery preference includes behavior exhibiting higher-order risk effects, such as precautionary effects and tempering effects.

Keywords: Downside; risk; Precautionary; effects; Prudence; Risk; apportionment; Risk; aversion; Stochastic; dominance; Temperance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WJ3 ... 125a68512c03830ed97d
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Apportioning of Risks via Stochastic Dominance (2008) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:144:y:2009:i:3:p:994-1003

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Theory is edited by A. Lizzeri and K. Shell

More articles in Journal of Economic Theory from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().

 
Page updated 2009-11-29
Handle: RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:144:y:2009:i:3:p:994-1003