Ramsey waits: Allocating public health service resources when there is rationing by waiting

Hugh Gravelle () and Luigi Siciliani ()

Journal of Health Economics, 2008, vol. 27, issue 5, pages 1143-1154

Abstract: The optimal allocation of a public health care budget across treatments must take account of the way in which care is rationed within treatments since this will affect their marginal value. We investigate the optimal allocation rules for public health care systems where user charges are fixed and care is rationed by waiting. The optimal waiting time is higher for treatments with demands more elastic to waiting time, higher costs, lower charges, smaller marginal welfare loss from waiting by treated patients, and smaller marginal welfare losses from under-consumption of care. The results hold for a wide range of welfarist and non-welfarist objective functions and for systems in which there is also a private health care sector. They imply that allocation rules based purely on cost effectiveness ratios are suboptimal because they assume that there is no rationing within treatments.

Date: 2008
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8K ... 850090110e91648eb3e5
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Ramsey Waits: Allocating Public Health Service Resources when there is Rationing by Waiting (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:27:y:2008:i:5:p:1143-1154

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Health Economics is edited by J. P. Newhouse, A. J. Culyer, R. Frank, K. Claxton and T. McGuire

More articles in Journal of Health Economics from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().