Accounting for productivity: Is it OK to assume that the world is Cobb-Douglas?

Shekhar Aiyar () and Carl-Johan Dalgaard ()

Journal of Macroeconomics, 2009, vol. 31, issue 2, pages 290-303

Abstract: The development accounting literature almost always assumes a Cobb-Douglas (CD) production function. However, if in reality the elasticity of substitution between capital and labor deviates substantially from 1, the assumption is invalid, potentially casting doubt on the commonly held view that factors of production are relatively unimportant in accounting for differences in labor productivity. We use international data on relative factor shares and capital-output ratios to formulate a number of tests for the validity of the CD assumption. We find that the CD specification performs reasonably well for the purposes of cross-country productivity accounting.

Keywords: Development; accounting; Aggregate; production; function; Elasticity; of; substitution; Total; factor; productivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6X4M ... 8bbe89d5dcda274edbce
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Accounting for Productivity: Is it OK to Assume that the World is Cobb-Douglas? (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jmacro:v:31:y:2009:i:2:p:290-303

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Macroeconomics is edited by Douglas McMillin and Theodore Palivos

More articles in Journal of Macroeconomics from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().