Is default risk acceptable when purchasing insurance? Experimental evidence for different probability representations, reasons for default, and framings

Anja Zimmer, Christian Schade and Helmut Gründl

Journal of Economic Psychology, 2009, vol. 30, issue 1, pages 11-23

Abstract: We experimentally analyze consumers' reactions to insurance default risk. Consistent with earlier studies, we find that insurance with default risk is extremely unattractive to most individuals. A considerable fraction of consumers completely refuse to accept any default risk; others ask for large reductions in insurance premiums. These findings are robust against several variations of the setup: probability representations (verbal and numeric), reasons for default (insolvency and claim settlement practices), framing (positively and negatively expressed probability of default), and comparisons between the policy's level of default and that of an alternative (default free and small default risk). The major driver of willingness to pay is level of security concern and decisions are sensitive to the default probability. All other effects on willingness to pay are unsystematic.

Keywords: Insurance; default; risk; Verbal; probabilities; Concern; Framing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8H ... b46d2c2dfc87bdf23f05
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:30:y:2009:i:1:p:11-23

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Psychology is edited by G. Antonides and D. Read

More articles in Journal of Economic Psychology from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().