Social interaction and urban sprawl

Jan K. Brueckner and Ann G. Largey

Journal of Urban Economics, 2008, vol. 64, issue 1, pages 18-34

Abstract: Various authors, most notably Putnam [Putnam, R.D., 2000. Bowling Alone. Simon and Schuster, New York], have argued that low-density living reduces social capital and thus social interaction, and this argument has been used to buttress criticisms of urban sprawl. If low densities in fact reduce social interaction, then an externality arises, validating Putnam's critique. In choosing their own lot sizes, consumers would fail to consider the loss of interaction benefits for their neighbors when lot size is increased. Lot sizes would then be inefficiently large, and cities excessively spread out. The paper tests the premise of this argument (the existence of a positive link between interaction and density) using data from the Social Capital Benchmark Survey. In the empirical work, social interaction measures for individual survey respondents are regressed on census-tract density and a host of household characteristics, using an instrumental-variable approach to control for the potential endogeneity of density.

Date: 2008
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WMG ... c95d371371a2776fbce5
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:juecon:v:64:y:2008:i:1:p:18-34

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Urban Economics is edited by S.S. Rosenthal and W.C. Strange

More articles in Journal of Urban Economics from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().