EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Optimal highway design and user welfare under value pricing

Thomas Light ()

Journal of Urban Economics, 2009, vol. 66, issue 2, pages 116-124

Abstract: This paper investigates the optimal design of highways operated under a form of congestion pricing called value pricing. Value pricing involves dividing a highway into free and priced lanes so that in equilibrium the highway effectively operates at two levels of service, with those users placing a higher value on travel time savings selecting the faster, priced route. A tractable analytical framework is developed which allows analysis of equilibrium and welfare on value priced highways when users vary in their value of time. The model is used to characterize optimal toll and capacity policies, as well as investigate the fiscal implications of value pricing. The analysis concludes with results on how welfare changes induced by value pricing are distributed over the population of users when the government finances any funding shortfall through a non-discriminatory taxing mechanism. A realistic numeric example is used to illustrate how the model can be applied to evaluation of actual and proposed value pricing implementations.

Keywords: Value; pricing; Congestion; pricing; Road; pricing; Highway; investment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WMG ... b3e6ff85eea1b601a143
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:juecon:v:66:y:2009:i:2:p:116-124

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Urban Economics is edited by S.S. Rosenthal and W.C. Strange

More articles in Journal of Urban Economics from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().

 
Page updated 2009-11-24
Handle: RePEc:eee:juecon:v:66:y:2009:i:2:p:116-124