The paradox of public participation in fisheries governance. The rising number of actors and the devolution process

Juan L. Suárez de Vivero, Juan C. Rodríguez Mateos and D. Florido del Corral

Marine Policy, 2008, vol. 32, issue 3, pages 319-325

Abstract: During the process by which the number of actors was increased manifold as a result of the development of civil society, the fisher community has lost prominence and importance, fading into the wide spectrum of interests with which it is competing to make its voice heard in decision-making bodies and in the media. This results in what could be termed the participation paradox--the greater the number of actors, the smaller the role each plays, and the lesser the importance of traditional sectors. Participation and devolution do not bear a linear relationship; greater devolution does not necessarily result in greater participation, a claim that has contributed to the processes of devolution being overvalued. Governance, as interaction between State, civil society and the market, paradoxically might not strengthen the most traditional of the interest groups.

Keywords: Fisheries; governance; Participation; Devolution; Co-management; Stakeholders; Competition. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VCD ... 307989f8495059d53b65
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:marpol:v:32:y:2008:i:3:p:319-325

Access Statistics for this article

Marine Policy is edited by Eddie Brown

More articles in Marine Policy from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Wendy Shamier ().