Does the value of recommendations depend on the level of optimism? A country-based analysis

Marina Balboa, Gomez-Sala, Juan Carlos and Germán López-Espinosa ()
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Juan Carlos Gomez Sala ()

Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 2008, vol. 18, issue 4, pages 405-426

Abstract: This paper analyzes the value of analysts' consensus recommendations and their changes in eight developed stock markets using data from Factset/JCF, in the period from January 1994 to December 2006. Results show that analysts are optimistically biased, albeit to a different degree in each country; issuing a much higher number of buy than sell recommendations. Sell recommendations seem to be a stronger signal than buy recommendations and the latter are more valuable in countries with a low optimism bias. Consensus changes are a valuable tool for making investment decisions in every country, independently of the level of bias. Thus, the level of bias of each country matters in consensus levels but not in consensus changes. The value of analysts' outputs is ultimately an empirical question with meaningful implications for practitioners and academics, since they can focus on the relevant variables when making investment decisions or analyzing firms' future prospects.

Date: 2008

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VGV ... 452dc3a38679c5764e3b
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:mulfin:v:18:y:2008:i:4:p:405-426

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Multinational Financial Management is edited by I. Mathur and G. G. Booth

More articles in Journal of Multinational Financial Management from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().