Do large cabinets favor large governments? Evidence on the fiscal commons problem for Swiss Cantons

Christoph A. Schaltegger () and Lars P. Feld ()

Journal of Public Economics, 2009, vol. 93, issue 1-2, pages 35-47

Abstract: The fiscal commons problem is one of the most prominent explanations of excessive spending in political economics. For a panel of the 26 Swiss cantons over the 1980-1998 periods, this paper explores the role of fragmented governments on fiscal policy outcomes. We distinguish between two variants of fragmented governments: cabinet size and coalition size. In addition, we analyze whether constitutional rules for executive and legislature as well as formal fiscal restraints shape the size of government and how different rules interact with fragmentation. The results indicate that the number of ministers in the cabinet is positively associated with the size of government. While fiscal referendums effectively restrict the size of government, there is also evidence that fiscal referendums relax the fiscal commons problem to some extent.

Keywords: Fragmentation; Fiscal; policy; Referendums; Legislative; rules; Formal; fiscal; restraints (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V76 ... 5fa5055d97055bf0feaa
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:93:y:2009:i:1-2:p:35-47

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Public Economics is edited by R. Boadway and J. Poterba

More articles in Journal of Public Economics from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().