Why are some independent inventors 'heroes' and others 'hobbyists'? The moderating role of technological diversity and specialization

Christopher Lettl, Katja Rost and Iwan von Wartburg

Research Policy, 2009, vol. 38, issue 2, pages 243-254

Abstract: Despite a substantial body of research investigating the market significance of inventions by independent inventors, relatively little attention has been devoted to understanding their technological significance. A recent study conducted by [Dahlin, K., Taylor, M., Fichman, M., 2004. Today's Edisons or weekend hobbyists: technical impact and success of inventions by independent inventors. Res. Policy 33, 1167-1183] on the tennis racket industry shows that independent inventors are a heterogeneous group which includes both "heroes" who contribute substantially to technological progress and "hobbyists" who make only a marginal contribution. What is not asked - and therefore not explained - is why this distinction arises. In this paper, we focus on the type of prior technological knowledge (in terms of technological specialization and diversity) applied by independent inventors and their corporate counterparts as a factor explaining differences in technological impact. Our empirical setting is the field of medical equipment technology. We find that independent inventors are more sensitive to the negative effects of technological diversity than their corporate counterparts. Furthermore, our study reveals that technological specialization pays off more for independent inventors than for their corporate counterparts. Therefore, those independent inventors who apply low degrees of diversity and high degrees of specialization are capable of reaching the same level as or even outperforming their corporate counterparts, thus becoming "heroes". Based on our findings, we discuss implications for research and corporate practice.

Keywords: Independent; inventor; Technological; progress; Specialization; Diversity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V77 ... 26ddd89b6b8d19b8e2cd
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:38:y:2009:i:2:p:243-254

Access Statistics for this article

Research Policy is edited by M. Callon, M. Bell, F. Kodama, B. Martin, F. Meyer-Krahmer, W. W. Powell, S. Thomke and N. Von Tunzelmann

More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().