Location, collocation and R&D alliances in the European ICT industry

Rajneesh Narula () and Grazia D. Santangelo ()

Research Policy, 2009, vol. 38, issue 2, pages 393-403

Abstract: This paper argues that spatial proximity plays a role in determining the propensity of firms to engage in R&D alliances. Drawing from economic geography, network theory and innovation theory, we discuss how prior collocation can affect the propensity to engage in R&D alliances, arguing that alliances can act both as a substitute and as a complement to collocation. Using a novel dataset matching alliances and patent data for the European ICT industry, we show that alliances are complementary to prior collocation (at both national and sub-national regional level) of firm's R&D labs. In such an intra-industry, oligopolistic scenario, firms strategically use R&D alliances as a means to limit knowledge flows and protect competences, rather than to promote knowledge flows. Furthermore, while a common institutional context is important to promote collaboration, because of the high level of R&D internationalisation as well as the complex social networks within an oligopolistic industry, national institutional contexts are less relevant.

Keywords: Alliances; Strategy; Collocation; Knowledge; flows (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V77 ... 5077baf1616cf0f8414e
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:38:y:2009:i:2:p:393-403

Access Statistics for this article

Research Policy is edited by M. Callon, M. Bell, F. Kodama, B. Martin, F. Meyer-Krahmer, W. W. Powell, S. Thomke and N. Von Tunzelmann

More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().