EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The role of corporate technology strategy and patent portfolios in low-, medium- and high-technology firms

Ulrich Lichtenthaler

Research Policy, 2009, vol. 38, issue 3, pages 559-569

Abstract: Previous research into technology strategies and patent portfolios has focused on high-technology firms, whereas low- and medium-technology companies have been relatively neglected. Therefore, we analyze how corporate technology strategy and the size and composition of patent portfolios affect the performance of low-, medium- and high-technology firms. Data from 136 European companies are used to examine four hypotheses relating financial performance to technological diversification, technological aggressiveness, patent portfolio size, and patent portfolio quality. The cross-industry sample allows analyzing the different consequences of these strategic parameters in low-, medium- and high-technology firms by considering technological intensity as a moderator. Our first finding is that the positive impact of technological aggressiveness is limited in low- and medium-technology companies. Secondly, technological diversification has a positive effect in high-technology firms and a negative effect in low-technology firms. Thirdly, patent portfolio size has a positive effect only in high-technology firms. Finally, patent portfolio quality has an equally positive influence on all firms' performance. In part, these results conflict with the findings of previous research into high-technology companies, and they call for rethinking the role of technology strategies and intellectual property portfolios in firms across industries.

Keywords: Low-; and; medium-technology; firms; High-technology; firms; Technology; strategy; Technological; diversification; Intellectual; property; management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V77 ... 0d18b6fae557300413df
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:38:y:2009:i:3:p:559-569

Access Statistics for this article

Research Policy is edited by M. Callon, M. Bell, F. Kodama, B. Martin, F. Meyer-Krahmer, W. W. Powell, S. Thomke and N. Von Tunzelmann

More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Heidi Boesdal ().

 
Page updated 2009-09-20
Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:38:y:2009:i:3:p:559-569